Books Feed
E-cigarettes and the Comparative Politics of Hurt Discount: Historical past, Proof and Coverage
Jul
E-Cigarettes and the Comparative Politics of Hurt Discount: Historical past, Proof, and Coverage. Virginia Berridge, Ronald Bayer, Amy L. Fairchild and Wayne Corridor (eds.). Palgrave Macmillan. 2023.
Discover this guide: 
Why can’t public well being agree on what to do about e-cigarettes? This guide goals to reply that conundrum. Extra particularly, why have fully divergent regimes of public well being management emerged within the US, UK, and Australia? In an period of shrinking sources, this controversy wastes time, power and confuses the general public. So why is a scientific and coverage consensus on vaping so elusive?
The editors, Virginia Berridge (UK), Wayne Corridor (Australia), and Ronald Bayer and Amy Fairchild (US) have come collectively to supply us solutions. The collective start line is that coverage can’t be about proof per se; the identical set of proof has produced startlingly completely different regulatory regimes. Somewhat, we should search for clues inside the histories and values of tobacco management in every nation to know how such schisms have arisen.
The identical set of proof has produced startlingly completely different regulatory regimes.
The primary chapter takes us again to earlier than e-cigarettes. In some methods the pre-histories of public well being coverage in every nation have been remarkably comparable. All moved from an environmental method controlling infectious ailments to an epidemiological one figuring out modifiable danger elements resembling tobacco. Variations have been rising, nonetheless, most notably the entrenchment of nicotine alternative remedy within the UK in contrast with Australia. Within the US, younger folks and kids have been the goal for tobacco management, alongside the extra overt use of tobacco denormalisation. Thus, the stage was set for the good e-cigarette showdown.
Within the US, younger folks and kids have been the goal for tobacco management, alongside the extra overt use of tobacco denormalisation.
Within the subsequent three chapters, the coverage historical past of e-cigarettes for every nation is examined. The primary to be thought of is the UK. Does its comparatively optimistic perspective in the direction of e-cigarettes as a instrument for hurt discount make it an outlier or a pioneer (or each)? What follows is a posh account exhibiting that the first focus has all the time been to cut back the chance to grownup people who smoke (laws forbids the promoting of vapes to below 18s). It’s argued that the seeds of the UK’s hurt discount place stem from its prior hurt discount historical past, NHS funding of Nicotine Alternative Remedy (NRT) and the optimistic attitudes of principal gamers resembling Public Well being England and Motion for Smoking on Well being (ASH).
This raises a query, nonetheless. Why has the UK targeted on grownup people who smoke? I’d argue that UK public well being was capable of preserve its hurt discount stance extra simply exactly as a result of, for many of that decade or extra, the majority of vapers within the UK have been adults. The youth vaping “epidemic” was taking place elsewhere, primarily within the US, and to some extent UK public well being could have felt insulated from this downside. Disposable vapes have modified this image, creating points when it comes to littering, baby habit, and public notion. It’s tougher to keep up an adult-focused coverage when there’s a danger to “harmless others”, nonetheless a lot this danger could seem small or misunderstood. Youth vaping prompts the ethical panic of youth drug use. With elevated youth charges, the UK is beginning to really feel the strain between the wants of the 2 teams because the US did a decade prior.
Disposable vapes have modified [the] image, creating points when it comes to littering, baby habit, and public notion.
The subsequent chapter examines how Australia ended up taking an nearly reverse method. Right here, e-cigarettes have successfully been banned; having been categorized as poisons, not obtainable for import and solely obtainable (not often) on prescription. The authors argue that this coverage has been pushed by concern over the “precautionary precept”: given unsure dangers, we must always take precautions. This, coupled with a stance towards NRT and fears concerning the “gateway” impact of e-cigarettes, has meant that few have stood exterior the orthodoxy of conserving e-cigarettes below medical laws. Regardless of this, 39 % of Australian people who smoke have tried an e-cigarette.
One salient level each chapters spotlight is the significance of Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) in main the cost for or towards e-cigarettes. The place they go, most different public well being organisations observe (with just a few exceptions). Actually, figures resembling Simon Chapman in Australia and Stanton Glantz within the US seem nearly legendary. Moreover, and that is hinted at within the guide, tobacco management insurance policies typically have an unarticulated nationwide id facet to them: hurt discount is the “English” means; Australia is pleased with having the bottom smoking charge. Between the heavy affect of KOLs and these collective public well being identities, there’s a lack of flexibility to reply to new considering or proof; all proof merely turns into included into present positions.
Tobacco management insurance policies typically have an unarticulated nationwide id facet to them.
The chapter on the US regulatory scene illustrates this completely. Till the current ban on the e-cigarette firm JUUL’s merchandise (now below overview), there was an absence of top-down federal regulation, with coverage making occurring at state and metropolis ranges. US coverage has been influenced vastly by the priority over youth vaping. The in depth JUUL use amongst youth is described repeatedly in quotes from coverage actors within the chapter as an “epidemic”. As precedent suggests, in an epidemic, logical decision-making is usually outmoded by emotional judgement. The ultimate chapter pulls collectively the threads to argue that proof itself isn’t driving coverage however values, pre-histories, and feelings.
In an epidemic, logical decision-making is usually outmoded by emotional judgement.
Total, the histories given by the authors are impressively advanced, with a few caveats. One is that the elements recognized are all essential, however we don’t get a lot of a way as to which is crucial. Would every part have been completely different had the KOLs been completely different? Second, it is a guide of particulars, at an nearly forensic stage. In case you are into tobacco management historical past, which I’m, that is extraordinarily helpful as a useful resource documenting this era in historical past. In case you are a extra informal reader interested by public well being usually, it may not attraction a lot. Lastly, resulting from house, little or no dialogue happens concerning the big worldwide drug coverage adjustments occurring concurrently in relation to hashish decriminalisation and legalisation. Why does the necessity for precaution and worry for “harmless others” not drive coverage so strongly right here? Are values much less essential than we expect?
This guide makes an essential contribution to the historical past of e-cigarette coverage and public well being extra usually. It’s convincing in its principal premise, that “it’s not about proof, it’s about emotion’” (49). The place that takes worldwide tobacco management subsequent continues to be unclear.
Notice: This overview offers the views of the writer, and never the place of the LSE Evaluate of Books weblog, or of the London Faculty of Economics and Political Science. The LSE RB weblog could obtain a small fee if you happen to select to make a purchase order by the above Amazon affiliate hyperlink. That is fully unbiased of the protection of the guide on LSE Evaluate of Books.
Primary Picture Credit score: Yarrrrrbright on Shutterstock.
